Even if the data is too over your head in terms of understanding, you will be able to evaluate the way that data is used... One way to judge scientific credibility (or lack thereof) is to scope out the logical structure of the arguments a scientist is putting up for consideration.
Here's how a credible research article should read (via Scientific American):
Quantitative Research
Qualitative Research
Mixed Methodology Research
For example, a mixed methods approach could use a survey with both closed questions to determine the number of times a given situation occurred (quantitative) and open-ended questions to determine participant attitudes (qualitative)
Can I answer these 3 questions, to validate support of using this article in my review:
1. Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings?
2. What was the research question of the study you are reviewing?
3. What were the research methodologies? Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions. Does the research seem to be complete? Could it have been conducted more soundly? What further questions does it raise?
Graphic from CompoundInterest.com, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.